Spica75 wrote:That´s a matter of "how easy is it to come up with odd stories for him", that doesn´t in any way define HIM.
That evades the main point of what I said, which I led up to in the final sentence.
Point is, that if you saw stick figures fighting, you could almost certainly pick the one that is Ranma.
It's the one with the pigtail, right?
Like Konsaki mentioned, you'd need something like a signature move to identify him, but his signature moves are probably only less than one-percent of his overall knowledge and arsenal as a martial artist, so it wouldn't make sense to showcase his entire character on those alone, if we're going to say that his style brings out the Ranma in him (and the signature moves in question aren't even a part of his martial arts style). What you're doing to tell Ranma apart from other stick figures is superficial, basing it on a technique he knows that others don't, not on who he is as a person. It would be no different than what I just joked about, by pointing at the figure with the pigtail.
Commonly, that is true, but in Ranma´s case i have to say that it´s so much part of his life and self that is defining in many ways.
The truth of that is rather quite limited, and strays from the point. Rather, it would be nice if we could tell what kind of person someone was just by seeing how they punch, but -- more often than not -- it's the context in which that punch is delivered that is the defining moment. For instance: just because someone was raised to learn ninjutsu, that doesn't mean that they're a cold-blooded killer. There's not much that we can learn about someone based on what style they know, aside from the circumstances that led them to learn it and why, but it's how and why they use it that will largely elucidate who they are as a person, not the style itself. It's no different from using any other tool, because it's not the tool that decides how -- exactly -- they're to be used, but the user.