But you argue that as soon as hes off screen he tries to read it but has no time becuase of unavoidable errands.
If its important, were told about it.
That is part of my argument. What he did at that time was not important to the storyline. Any number of things could have happened that really do not have impact on the storyline. For all we know Happosai stole his copy of the play and he spent most of the time trying to get it back. We do not know the details of what happened at that time any number of things could have prevented him from reading it, the only acceptable to you seems to be that he didn't feel like it.
The core of my argument is simply we do not know why Ranma did not read it. There are many completely valid reason that he might not have done so. Therefor it is or isn't a stupid act depending on what his reason for not reading it was. Since we do not know the reason we can not say with any accuracy whether it was or not.
Didn't feel like it = stupid.
Happosai and such bugged him preventing him = not stupid.
Didn't think to read it = stupid
Copy was destroyed and circumstances prevented him from obtaining it = not stupid. etc...
I dont understand your book example. These adventures were eventually told to you, therefore happnened, therefore the auhtor wanted you to know.
My problem is that you invent things that the author dosnt write about,
They were told in passing like what was Harold doing when I was fighting the damn dragon. He was fighting in the merchant army. Aren't actually told anything. Had a point to the story to explain why character wasn't there, else we wouldn't have known anything about it at all.
I'm not inventing anything. I am showing that there is more than one variable. More than one thing could have happened at the time.
To keep on topic, technically debating is on topic, a stupid thing done is Genma training Ranma in the Neko-ken without finding out the complete details of the technique or trying to steal the nearly worthless object from Ranma's mother.