Crescent Pulsar S wrote:Fun doesn't exclude serious things, though. One common way of being a fan is dedicating time and effort into something, in some form or another. (For instance, this site wasn't started for shits and giggles, but to serve an actual purpose.) Reviews and ratings have both a practical and useful place in fandom, which can improve someone's experience. While that doesn't always work out as intended, that potential failure is no reason to cast it aside. It's not like we're restricted to being either formal or casual about this, and I'm certainly not suggesting that there would only be serious reviewers with an obligation to provide reviews. Reviews should be open to whoever's actually willing, but the problem is that not many stories got a review (or a proper one) before, and I think that stories (especially the finished ones) deserve at least one, decent review in the one place that's specifically dedicated to them. Am I wrong in thinking that?
I've been involved in judging quite a few competitions, and the pressure is intense. "Say something useful, but don't hurt their feelings." That's how many writers' groups operate -- but people who aren't used to that have tender feelings, easily bruised. When giving reviews on FFnet I try to keep it positive, but there've been occasions I simply haven't been able to. Grammar corrections usually go in a PM -- they're fiddling detail, not a review for the world to read -- but when somebody jumps the shark in a story I've previously been enjoying, I can't always stop myself from putting it in a review.
And that's the trouble with honest reviews: you keep running into
Sturgeon's Law.
Most decent stories on FFnet have many reviews. I've seen stories with thousands, and even a few with tens of thousands. Stories with only a few reviews aren't likely to draw the attention of reviewers, nor raise their desire to review.
What would be far more useful would be lists of
recommendations. Which already exist. I already subscribe to several. One I use is
DM's Best Completed Stories. Not reviews, recommendations. It works well to check the Favorites lists
of authors you like, or of authors that like you.
Reviews happen, anyway. Recommendations happen. If somebody wants to do it, no reason they shouldn't. I count PCHeinz' reading list as suggestions. There are the "looking for a story" threads, and I check out
those possibilities too. Nothing stops any of us from writing reviews, and we can post them anywhere we thing there's an audience. I just don't see the need to do it any more formally than it already is.