But the amount of evidence towards utopia is greater then the amount of evidence against it. Byt that I mean we have on testimonial that it is a utopia, while no character ever implies that it wouldn't be.
We have testimonial from one of the
leaders of Crystal Tokyo. Real unbiased source. Are we now to take the Taliban at their word when they say their government is reasonable?
Rather the general meat of your arguement is that Usagi is inadaquite as a leader and would fail to correctly fulfull her intention of creating a utopia.
Not entirely.
More that Usagi would inadequately envision said utopia, and thus the crystal would operate off the simplistic definitions within her mind. For instance, I could entirely see her 'utopia' as giving everyone a 'Mamo-chan' analogue and a 'so in love it's almost sad' brain makeover - that's a large part of her happiness, and as such it will inherently infect her definition of happiness.
And also that
any individual, let alone Usagi, is already inadequate to wave a crystal and make a utopia, because no matter what, when you come down to it,
any utopia has to either alter aspects of human nature, or remove the people who possess them. And thus it's something
I would be willing to throw my life against.
I see, however genre, tone, and tehme are all a amjor part of the material. If the goal of this arguement is to decide how crystal tokyo would exist had we seen the city in cannon, thne you must concede that the tone and theme would play a central role in all of this. To ignore those is to ignore a large part of the work.
But that's not the goal.
The goal is to go through the evidence provided in the source and use that to conclude what Crystal Tokyo is like. Since Takeuchi has apparently violated her own canon in several places, it is entirely reasonable - in fact almost unavoidable - to be forced to ignore certain aspects and focus on others to make any projections that weren't directly shown. When all the evidence can't be reconciled in any working theory, some of it has to be skipped.
Genre, tone, and theme are all aspects we as the readers project upon it. As such, they are the weakest 'evidence', and the ones that must be thrown away to clear the way for what all the other evidence suggests. And to my knowledge, since no one has brought up any points to the contrary, all the evidence within the actual source material is in line with our present hypotheses.
That much evidence lining up from this source is actually pretty impressive.
First I would apoligize, I had no intention of insinuating that your evidence was circumstantial.
No problem. Wasn't much offense anyway.
Secondly we have seen no mindless purified zombies in SM, rather we have seen balanced people.
We've not seen much in the way of 'people' in Crystal Tokyo at all. We've seen the Senshi, and we've seen people willing to die to fight against it.
People calling it a Utopia?
Again, 'people' being the most ludicrously biased source possible.
except for the fans who love turning the senshi into an evil and decadent group. (Which can be fun on occasion)
'Evil', 'evil', 'evil'! Stop saying such a useless word!
'Evil' is a word that has almost completely lost meaning - right now, all it really means is 'person who doesn't agree with me'. As such, technically the Senshi and the entirety of Sailor Moon
are evil. But because of the word's connotations and how uselessly subjective it is, I don't waste my time with it.
I'm evil. You're evil. We're all evil. Now leave it alone.
What we love doing is, essentially, projecting our world view on the fairy-tale world presented in Sailor Moon, and coming up with theories that we find far more reasonable than the excessively juvenile conclusions that Sailor Moon's worldview follows.
Which, I suppose, is a lot more cumbersome to say than 'make the senshi evil'

But they all have marked similarities as I have pointed out. And in each, the end result was a well balanced human being with no zombie nature. Okkam's razor again applies here and would indicate the results would stay consistent.
But that necessitates the
presence of 'dark powers' placed on or within such a large segment of society that she could be described as 'purifying the world'. And that, as we've made clear, is only a theory which is not in line with some inductive evidence.
The sisters' actions tended to be somewhat... insane if you think about it. After they are purified they are no longer insane. Thus according to that arguement it wouldn't be moral to force a seriously insane person, who is detrimental to their health and others to accept psychiatric help that would allow them to function in normal society, while remaining a complete human being?
Right. And waving a magical rock and
remaking a person without their consent is justifiable in the slightest. Remember that this is Usagi's definition of 'a complete human being' - as such, it is innately inadequate, since an individual person doesn't even have a complete understanding of
themself, let alone the totality of human potential.
If I am insane, it is
my right to remain insane until such time as I choose otherwise.
It is also the right of others to shoot me should I become a threat to anyone but myself, just to note that. And while I will defend
myself to the death, I will also defend to the death their right to do it.
You can't 'remove' parts of a person and end up with a complete human being - just a caricature. Psychotherapy is somewhat of a different ballgame since it's an actual process of
development. All the alteration and work comes from
within, not a magical rock on the outside.
So you agree that she removed the evil from them, and they were balanced people afterwards. That would indicate her definition of evil, doesn't include people who aren't happy 100% of the time, as in that she wouldn't leave the world as mindless zombies but as thinking intelligent people.
Not so. Since in all those cases, she had an explicit influence to focus on removing - dark power infusions, restoring the shine, etc. That was not 'removing evil'. Merely restoring the native state.
Have you considered that purification could be the removal of cancer, disease, psychological illness, and whatnot. All of those would be 'evil' things in Usagi's mind. And without them people wouldn't be zombies, rather they would be normal people.
Again:
Come up with a 'purification' that reasonable people would willingly throw themselves into combat with a veritable
goddess to prevent.
There is no problem that cannot be solved through the proper application of immense levels of firepower.
- Finally promoted to Spammaster Indeterminate Rank as of June 18, by Stratagemini
<Stratagemini> My Titanium Anus Armour will repel all challengers!
Would you believe this is one of the more tame bits of dirt I've got for him?