FOG3 wrote:A good oak Bokkens is tougher then a Katana from what I understand of such things and is more then capable of killing someone if necessary. Miyamoto Musashi didn't use wood to play fair, he used it because it worked good and furthermore was cheap. Don't let some sort of steel fetish blind you to how effective a booken is. Even now a bokken depending upon source and quality is like 20-50 dollars a Katana is more like 200-1,000 dollars. In the old days a Katana was supposed to have cost as much as their estates. Which would you rather haul around for everyday use?
As someone who's carried a weapon around everyday with him for twelve months (along with body armor and helmet) in a combat zone, I'd rather have the bokken with me. After all, it's easier to question the injured than a dead guy.
And that was a complaint that someone pointed out as well in one of my fics; I had fat, lazy Panda-man complain that his son was weak for carrying a sword. Which is not always the case. As I write the story, Ranma still uses his unarmed skills and ki attacks, but, when someone wants your head, even having even a quarterstaff is good for self-defense.
A weapon in the hand of a competent martial artist is a tool, to extend their reach. In a one-on-one duel, the results are usually fatal, particularly if they're using bladed weapons like katanas or naginatas.
There's a scene in "Seven Samurai", one of
the preeminent samurai movies, IMHO, where a master has been challenged. The duel is fought with bamboo first, and the challenger would have lost his life had they been fighting with blades. He persists, however, and the master is then
forced to respond with his katana, ending the challenge permanently.
So, what have we learned in my rantings now:
a) Dead men tell no tales
b) Fanon over-does the "weapon users are weak" crutch which leads to:
c) In the hands of a competent martial artist, a weapon is a tool
d) A martial artist would rather have a live student than a dead challenger