May have to do with time being a secondary byproduct of matter interaction insted of something fundamental as people thought in the past.
Wait, WHAT??
Damnit, this is what happens when you use math blindly, assuming that the math IS reality, instead of the REPRESENTATION of reality that it actually is. Dangerous. Always logic-check, always see if you can get the result with pure theory or nonmathematical modelling before assuming it's correct.
It's the kind of thinking that ends up with results like "if you go faster than light you travel backwards in time", which is obvious rubbish. It can be said to be based on that if you travel FTL away from something, then you will effectively be able to move your PERCEPTION of time of that something backwards in time, but there's absolutely no timetravel involved.
TIME is a fundamental thing, and also definitely not a dimension, however, PERCEPTION of time can be "bent", and perception of time is what is affected by matter and gravity.
IF time was a byproduct of matter interaction, well then we would be seeing some really weird shit, like a universe where different parts had different ages depending on their "local" matter clustering frame of reference. And events potentially happening at the same time and place despite not directly interacting because their "local" timeframes are different.
If you want to improve understanding, my suggestion is reading what Einstein wrote PERSONALLY on the subject, NOT what others interpret his writings as, because those two tends to be very different things.
I am absolutely sure that goes IRL, for all of us, but it's so subtle no one ever notices and no one ever tried experimentally because using human test subjects that way is for dr. Mengele.
You cannot convince me otherwise, not after that time when my hands glitched while I was tying my shoe, exhibiting inexplicable clumsiness or even refusing my brain's commands outright... For exactly long enough for me to miss a date with a bathtub-sized chunk of ice that fell from the roof 8 stories up.
Ah well, my personal experience is really the opposite, clumsiness has a very sharp tendency to be the cause of accidents and misfortune.
P.S. Or it simply only works well in PVE and such systems negate each other in PVP thus necessitating sapience.
*lol*
Drunks are often exceptionally lucky IRL, surviving events they shouldn't have. Maybe because of not having conscious thoughts that usually override the subtle manipulations of that system. It had to evolve adapted to animals, not stubborn thinking beings.
But one has to be very drunk, at the stage of not having conscious thoughts.
We-eell, there's definitely two things in play here, at least.
On the one hand, people that are drunk tend to be far more physically relaxed, something that can help prevent or mitigate injury in a number of ways, this is not something monopolised by drunks however, it's something that can be taught and is part of the basics of martial arts, learning how to fall, which is usually the first thing learned.
On the other hand however, is the fact that drunks are almost never quite as uninjured from falls or whatever, as they appear. Because they're drunk, they fail to fully NOTICE their injuries however, but they're still there.
Also, in regards to "lucky", try go read about people surviving the most extreme falls. You will not belive it. Most extreme known that i can recall is when a gunner from a B-17 during WWII fell together with a piece of the plane that got shot loose, from IIRC around ~10km height, and wasn't even badly injured by the fall. Definitely not drunk.
But in canon Usagi is a merry drunk, as the older anime series shows us.
True, but still funny.
