Amarielah wrote:So then, by your very definition, Akane has a right to do what she does when RANMA goes on a date with somebody else (which he does quite frequently)? Once again, the fact that Ryouga committed an 'injustice' first does not justify the fact that Ranma commits an 'injustice' in retaliation (and in this case it's even debatable if Ranma is doing it with any retaliation in mind). This time, Ranma was in the wrong.
Wrong, this is ignoring many circumstances. First of all, Ryoga, knowing that Akane is engaged to Ranma, and Akane, knowing she is engaged to Ranma, should not be dating. Ranma, however, has conflicting engagments, not of his own fault (Kiss of Marrige was given _in Japan_ protecting Akane, Ranma had no responsibility to know what his actions would have caused until after the fact (Kiss of Death was different, but mostly the Jusenkyo guide's fault for not warning the Saotomes about Amazon laws that obvioulsy applied)). The only excuses Akane would have for attacking Ranma for dating Tatewaki Kuno on various occasions to trick something out of him, and the date competition between the White Rose and the Black Rose, all other situations I can remember were with legitimate fiancees or under some form of extreme manipulation (such as when Ranma went on a date with Hikaru Gosunkugi during the paper doll arc... when they were both boys...).
Ranma's actions against Ryoga were completely justified, he was protecting the honor of both Akane and Akari, whom Ryoga was taking advantage of, when any sort of challenge would have been innefective, as Akane would have simply ordered Ranma away or it would have caused a fight at Ryoga's house which would have damaged the property, and Ranma considers Ryoga in a more positive light than Ryoga deserves, and wouldn't have wanted that to happen.
Akane lacks justification because, not only are all of Ranma's dating situations justified (where Ryoga and Akane's aren't) but Akane doesn't even bother to find out what's really going on most of the time. Ranma, on the other hand, takes stock of a situation before acting, even though people rarely bother to tell him anything.
Ranma's injustice towards Ryoga is justified because it was the only workable solution Ranma could come up with to the problem. Ranma, of course, could have chalenged Ryoga to battle for the slight to Akane's honor and his own, and Ryoga, upon spotting Ranma, likely would have gone berserk in his own house, damaging it. Under the circumstances, Ryoga's stupidity made other actions bad ideas. Also, the role Ranma took as Ryoga's little sister, was in my opinion, if you ignore lack of blood ties, almost true, Ranma _does_ treat Ryoga much like a rival, missed sibling, or something along those lines, despite Ryoga's despicable actions. Ranma even protects Ryoga's secrets above Akane's honor! If you look at things closely, you'd probably realize that Ryoga, in some ways, treats Ranma much better than Ranma's parents do, despite openly trying to kill him and behaving dishonorably towards Akane about his curse.
While two wrongs don't make a right, and the end doesn't allways justify the means, and it's often the means that makes the difference between a good person and a bad person with good intentions, I'd say, even in the case of the Ryoga's sister incident, Ranma was behaving as a good person. Partially because he wasn't doing something that would change Ryoga's opinion of him if found out. Ryoga allready sees Ranma as decietful, manipulative, cheating, tricky, ect. If Ranma had been considered a highly kind and honest person by Ryoga, it would have not been a good thing to do, because it would be betraying Ryoga's trust in him.
"Health, Learning & Virtue will ensure your happiness; they will give you a quiet conscience, private esteem & public honor." Thomas Jefferson (1743 - 1826)